Binance Faces £150M Lawsuit From UK Investors

Binance Faces £150M Lawsuit From UK Investors

Almost 1,700 UK-based investors have filed a £150 million lawsuit against Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao in the London High Court, alleging the exchange sold crypto derivatives products without the required regulatory approval.

The claim covers the period beginning January 2021, when the Financial Conduct Authority first banned crypto derivatives from being sold to retail investors, through to when Binance later faced direct restrictions on its UK operations.

What the Lawsuit Alleges

The claimants are represented by KP Law, which argues that Binance's leverage tokens, futures contracts, and options products breached the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The firm says these offerings remained accessible to UK customers even after the FCA's ban took effect, and that Binance had no meaningful system in place to block UK users from accessing them.

Binance said it intends to contest the claims through the courts and remains committed to operating within applicable law. The lawsuit also names Binance-affiliated Nest Exchange and unidentified persons as additional defendants.

Customers Describe Major Losses

One claimant, financial controller Tomas Sutas, put more than £100,000 into Binance's derivatives products before the positions lost their value entirely. Several other UK users reportedly lost tens of thousands of pounds through the same products.

KP Law said it is still working to determine the full number of customers affected, noting that Binance's scale as one of the world's largest exchanges means exposure could extend well beyond the claimants currently identified.

Background on the FCA Restrictions

Binance's UK operations were sharply curtailed in June 2021, when the FCA notified Binance Markets Limited that it could not operate in the country without the regulator's written permission.

Why the Timing Matters

The case arrives at a difficult period for Binance. The exchange missed a July 1 deadline to secure a license under the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets framework, and continues to face separate allegations tied to sanctioned Iranian transactions, which it denies.

/embed

The broader pattern of crypto firms facing legal and regulatory pressure is well established. The industry is spending heavily to shape the legislative environment precisely because legal exposure across multiple jurisdictions continues to grow, a dynamic detailed in Crypto Super PAC and AIPAC Spend $12.5M to Elect Maryland's Next Congressman. The outcome of the CLARITY Act, now moving through Congress and covered in America's Most Consequential Crypto Bill Is on the Brink, will determine how much of that exposure is resolved through clearer federal law and how much remains subject to litigation of this kind.